<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iLike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.writing.adancingstar.com/2005/ilike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.writing.adancingstar.com/2005/ilike/</link>
	<description>a life's reading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.writing.adancingstar.com/2005/ilike/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writing.adancingstar.com/index.php/2005/ilike/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>You know, iWoke this evening from my office slumber and my site counter went click-clacking like crazy, thanks to macsurf.com. Mac-ers are passionate, and passion is a great thing. 

Is music private? Sure, there are intensely &lt;i&gt;private moments&lt;/i&gt; during which we connect to the Divine while music-ed up, but that is different from the &lt;em&gt;nature &lt;/em&gt;of music. In this sense, it can never be, however much we try or wish it so. Less dogmatically, one could at least make a case for saying that &quot;private&quot; music is a lesser musical &lt;i&gt;experience&lt;/i&gt; than, for example, a concert, or for the teens amongst us, clubbing. 

I think, though, that a distinction should be made between the iPod as a &quot;design iCon&quot;, which I find questionable, and the iPod as a &quot;social phenonmenon&quot; (or consumerist trend) which I detest - and Mac-ers are the least trend following of creatures, I think. However, when considering the iPod as a &lt;i&gt;concept&lt;/i&gt;, there are several core aspects which I admire (and applaud), one of which is the resurrection of radio. It&#039;s questionable whether I&#039;m &quot;anti-iPod&quot; as you think. 

Thanks for the comment and typo heads up, Martin. It was taken in good heart, much as how you left your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, iWoke this evening from my office slumber and my site counter went click-clacking like crazy, thanks to macsurf.com. Mac-ers are passionate, and passion is a great thing. </p>
<p>Is music private? Sure, there are intensely <i>private moments</i> during which we connect to the Divine while music-ed up, but that is different from the <em>nature </em>of music. In this sense, it can never be, however much we try or wish it so. Less dogmatically, one could at least make a case for saying that &#8220;private&#8221; music is a lesser musical <i>experience</i> than, for example, a concert, or for the teens amongst us, clubbing. </p>
<p>I think, though, that a distinction should be made between the iPod as a &#8220;design iCon&#8221;, which I find questionable, and the iPod as a &#8220;social phenonmenon&#8221; (or consumerist trend) which I detest &#8211; and Mac-ers are the least trend following of creatures, I think. However, when considering the iPod as a <i>concept</i>, there are several core aspects which I admire (and applaud), one of which is the resurrection of radio. It&#8217;s questionable whether I&#8217;m &#8220;anti-iPod&#8221; as you think. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment and typo heads up, Martin. It was taken in good heart, much as how you left your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.writing.adancingstar.com/2005/ilike/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writing.adancingstar.com/index.php/2005/ilike/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Rather ironic that 2 sentences after comnplaining about the grammar violations of Apple&#039;s i-words, you yourself fail the grammar test with: &quot;Surely it natural&quot;    :-)

I could argue that Music is often intensely private, but I won&#039;t bother- I&#039;ll just go off and hum a tune to myself while iWork.

However, even if that part of your argument did hold water it is a sorry argument against the iPod for which there are *so* many add-ons that people buy to turn the iPod&#039;s music into a public experience -  speakers, fm radio transmitters, docks, av cables etc 

With your anti-iPod reaction, man you iRritate.   ;-)

-Mart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather ironic that 2 sentences after comnplaining about the grammar violations of Apple&#8217;s i-words, you yourself fail the grammar test with: &#8220;Surely it natural&#8221;    <img src='http://adancingstar.com/writing/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I could argue that Music is often intensely private, but I won&#8217;t bother- I&#8217;ll just go off and hum a tune to myself while iWork.</p>
<p>However, even if that part of your argument did hold water it is a sorry argument against the iPod for which there are *so* many add-ons that people buy to turn the iPod&#8217;s music into a public experience &#8211;  speakers, fm radio transmitters, docks, av cables etc </p>
<p>With your anti-iPod reaction, man you iRritate.   <img src='http://adancingstar.com/writing/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-Mart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

